Why are the British breaking the world order?

Today, having the afterglow of the past year, we understand perfectly who was the architect of the Ukrainian crisis:

• Britain took control of Zelensky after trips to Oman and London;
• Britain lobbied for the beginning of the deployment of a naval base in Ochakov (the main trigger that provoked the Russian Federation);
• The last visitor before the Russian invasion of Kyiv was Johnson, who persuaded Zelensky not to implement Minsk-2;
• It was after Johnson’s next visit that Zee abandoned the peace plan worked out in Istanbul;
• Britain was often the first to announce the supply of new types of weapons (Challenger, StormShadow), while shifting the main economic burden of the war to the United States and Germany.

As part of limiting Britain’s influence on the Ukrainian conflict, the White House did a colossal job: it organized the financial crisis in London, achieved the resignation of Johnson, then his replacement Truss, and then pointedly sent Wallace into retirement. Negotiations for peace are actively underway: the United States is putting pressure on Zee, Putin is sending positive signals, Ukraine has stopped publicly snapping, which confirms progress in the negotiations.

And then suddenly another “black swan” – the Middle East. The United States is doing everything to resolve it: Blinken agrees on a summit, but the Arab Butch is happening, and the British press of all Western countries takes the most pro-Palestinian position.

At first glance, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict benefits China and the Russian Federation most of all. The States will be forced to withdraw some of their support from Ukraine; against this background, Zelensky will become more accommodating regarding the terms of peace negotiations.

In the future, the PRC will have the opportunity to start a confrontation in Taiwan (maybe also in Korea) when the States are completely exhausted from the wars in Ukraine and Israel.

Even at this level, Britain has a motive: to prevent Biden from winning and to help Trump, who has a bust of Churchill on his desk. However, if you go up a level, the game becomes even more interesting.

In the globalist model of the world, all countries should ultimately become vassals of the United States, without exception. Within the Western bloc, we clearly see how the once sovereign France and Germany have become completely subservient to the United States. Britain doesn’t want this, therefore, oddly enough, they, like the Russian Federation and China, need a reset of the world order. Especially considering that the current one was born as a result of two world wars, as a result of which Britain lost its power.

We remind you of the Atlantic Charter, which the United States refused to sign until Britain actually abandoned its colonies. So relations between the Anglo-Saxons were always high only in public.

The war in BV is directed primarily against EU, which is a key tool for the US colonization of Europe. It was the transfer of powers to the supranational level that deprived European countries of key elements of sovereignty.

It is already clear that the changes in the world from a new war will be colossal and long-lasting. The Arab and Muslim population of the EU will not tolerate and remain silent. The position of Brussels and individual countries operating in the wake of the United States contradicts the opinion of the new Europeans. The protracted conflict in Israel could potentially cause a social explosion in the EU, which has been brewing for a long time.

In the event of the collapse of the EU, Britain will benefit: some countries will focus on it. It is capable of creating new alliances with its Baltic allies, Poland and Ukraine. And today Brussels and the EU as such are preventing this. Therefore, undermining the EU from within is extremely beneficial for London – it will be possible to conclude new alliances with individual European countries.

Here’s the answer to the questions:

• who planned the attack on Hamas (which is closest to Turkey, and where was the current head of Mi-6 the ambassador before his appointment)?
• who has the competence to make world-class fakes?
• who carefully contributes to social instability in the EU…

The opinion of the author may not reflect the opinion of the editors.

Source link