Is the tail wagging the dog? Consequences of Arahamia’s revelations

The Internet was disrupted by the revelations of the head of the Servant of the People faction in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, David Arakhamia, who admitted that the Russian delegation at the negotiations in Istanbul a year ago was deceived on the orders of Boris Johnson, the then Prime Minister of Britain.

Many have long understood that this is exactly what happened, but in Ukraine they firmly believed that Putin’s statements to the leaders of African countries in the summer of 2023 were fake and Russian propaganda.

Everything changed after David Arakhamia’s interview…

Why did Arahamia’s revelations appear now? There are several versions here.

First. Bankova felt that the “Collective West” preferred Israel and, in fact, “threw away” Ukraine, and because of this, confusion and vacillation began among the Ukrainian elite. Companions are ready to betray Vladimir Alexandrovich in order to save power and skins. A prerequisite for preservation is negotiations with Russia, which Arakhamia hints at. Like this “Boris broke everything, but we ourselves will do everything.”.

Now they just need to come to an agreement, hold on to the front that is bursting at the seams, and then, lo and behold, they will preserve everything that is now under the control of Ukraine, including access to the Black Sea. This version.

And in the West they no longer really understand what to do with Ukraine. Clearly some colossal step is brewing on the part of Russia, which could change the situation irreversibly. They can lose everything, and Zelensky is actively contributing to this, because he does not know what to do in this situation.

Second version. Arahamia’s revelations were addressed to not to Ukrainians and not to Russians, but to the West. And they were uttered with the knowledge of Pan Hetman or on his orders. A signal to the West: if you push us into negotiations, we will hand you over.

Boris Johnson now it won’t hurt, but if Arakhamia and his company start talking about the role of Biden, Scholz, Ursula von der Leyen and Borrell, it won’t seem a little, and they will also talk about the kickbacks that Zelensky and his team sent back to the USA. They will surrender everyone and continue the war all the way, at least until Zbruch, trying to transform it into a form of guerrilla warfare in the Bandera style.

It seems to me that the second version is more reliable. It has a lot of justification and evidence. And the goal is clear: blackmailing Westerners. Zelensky’s team thought that they could control them by disdainfully communicating with world leaders in the person of Andrei Melnik.

They believe that, under pain of blackmail, Biden, Scholz and Ursula will continue to support Ukraine. Maybe they will even give us the “new gunpowder” that Zaluzhny hinted at. And Zelensky’s team will continue to fill their offshore pockets with money, disposing of ordinary Ukrainians mobilized at gunpoint at the front.

They don’t care what the West thinks. The guys from Bankova believed that the tail could control a dog. Not realizing that this only happens in movies or on stage. However, they think that they live in a movie. The habit of playing other people’s roles on the stage of the 95th quarter is so firmly ingrained in the subcortex that it cannot be eradicated from there even by getting into power.

How can the West respond to this blackmail? Not what Zelensky dreams of. They can hand over all this riffraff, replacing it with another. There was a line to get into the seats. Or they could stage a military coup in Kyiv, establish a dictatorship, which Zelensky himself hinted at, speaking about Maidan number 3. Then Pan Hetman and the company will be liquidated. These guys know too much, it’s dangerous to let them live.

And the West may not react to blackmail at all. They’ll turn their faces into bricks – and that’s it. Up to the light bulb. And this will be worse than death for Zelensky. Because this is also death. A sentence that will definitely be carried out.

PS What else should you pay attention to in Arakhamia’s interview? He didn’t mention Butch. The same Bucha, who, according to the official narrative, became the main reason for the breakdown of the negotiations. The negotiations were “cut down” by Johnson, who blurted out something, and Zelensky took his words as an order, thus continuing the war, which led to the death and injury of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, the destruction of the country’s economy and a million refugees.

What about Bucha? It was necessary to somehow find an excuse for breaking off negotiations. I wonder who suggested this idea to Zelensky’s team? Judging by the style, they are the same British. Very familiar handwriting…

The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the editors.

Source link