The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, said that the reaction of the “Kyiv regime” to the damage to the Crimean bridge speaks “of its terrorist nature.” On the bridge today, October 8 in the morning, a truck exploded.
“The reaction of the Kyiv regime to the destruction of civilian infrastructure testifies to its terrorist nature,” Ms. Zakharova wrote on her Telgram channel.
Formerly Advisor to the Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Mykhailo Podolyak wrote on Twitter that the Crimean bridge is only the “beginning”.
Officially, Ukraine did not take responsibility for the emergency.
” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>New York Times
The United States did not contribute
in the implementation of this plan – neither by providing intelligence information, nor by providing any other assistance. According to the authors, in Washington they assure that they did not know about the operation in advance, and if they did, they would strongly oppose it.
According to representatives of the American authorities who spoke with the publication, the United States has already expressed dissatisfaction with Kyiv in connection with the murder of Dugina. As the New York Times writes, the US government is disappointed that Kyiv, as it turned out, does not always consider it necessary to devote Washington to its military plans, especially in covert operations planned on Russian territory.
In turn, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said: “We are well aware that behind such materials in an American newspaper are American official structures that do not want to name themselves for some reason they understand.”
“But in fact, it’s time for Washington to speak loudly, frankly and clearly about its involvement in the situation in Ukraine. For real, from regime change to their motives for destroying gas pipelines,” Zakharova said.