"The path forward is unclear". What the world media are writing about the summit in Switzerland

According to Reuters, “the path forward is unclear,” and officially, “no country has proposed holding another such meeting.” This includes Saudi Arabia, which has been discussed as a possible future location.

The agency also noted the difference in the positions of the “global South” and the West: while the former calls for direct negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow and “difficult compromises,” Western leaders at the summit approved Kyiv’s refusal to negotiate on Russia’s terms.

British Air Force notes that to the stated goal summit – presenting Russia’s plan approved there, “with international consensus behind it,” is still a very long way off. “If this ever becomes possible,” the publication makes a reservation.

Ukraine is trying to seize the initiative for a peaceful settlement because “Ukrainian support may fall in the coming months.” This is due to the presidential elections in the United States, as well as the growing number of votes in Europe for right-wing parties, “often sympathetic to Russia.” “The country itself is also exhausted from more than two years of war: the rows of military graves in cemeteries across the country are growing, and volunteers are no longer rushing to military registration and enlistment offices in droves,” writes the BBC.

“The weekend summit ended unexpectedly, several hours earlier than expected. For Ukraine, it was not an unqualified success. But for President Zelensky, it was a chance to convey his main message: Russia, like a school bully, reacts only to force,” the publication summarizes .

New York Times records that the countries participating in the summit “divided in opinion on how to interact with Russia.” The newspaper notes that while the declaration calls for “dialogue between all sides” to end the war, “Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he remains firmly opposed to any negotiations that might require his country to cede territory.”

The publication cites the opinion of the largest country that has not signed the statement, India: “Only those options that are acceptable to both sides can lead to lasting peace.” At the same time, “Ukraine’s Western allies said little about possible peace negotiations with Russia.” “Developments on the battlefield will undoubtedly affect any settlement,” the publication adds.

Swiss publication Swiss Info announced a “lack of consensus” at the summit, although it believes that “the real world has become closer for Ukraine.” Journalists write that at the summit there was a “diplomatic tug of war” between outright condemnation of the Russian invasion and language that would receive the widest possible support.

The publication also notes that in final declaration There is no mention of a follow-up conference, although some states, according to Zelensky, “have declared their readiness to hold such a summit.”

Chinese Xinhua News Agency released a short news story about the end of the summit, which was devoted to the position of the countries of the Global South, which refused to sign the final statement. It also stated the position that “most of the decisions made at the event cannot be implemented without the participation of Russia.”

Source link