On the “correct” use of fakes in geopolitics

Since the beginning of a new round of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we have witnessed the most interesting use of technology “double fake” to change the behavior of an entire state. We are talking about Israel and its ability to respond to a Hamas attack.

The attack itself was unprecedented. It affected not only military targets, but also Israeli civilians and foreigners. One of the first blows was taken by the electronic music festival on the border. Real creepy footage of executions from smartphones and action cameras so much was caught online that the Israeli government felt that it now had the right to respond as it saw fit. These, we repeat, real footage did not leave anyone in the world indifferent. No politician would dare say that Israel has no right to a tough response.

And the IDF began bombing the Gaza Strip, carelessly for the presence of civilians there and even their own civilians who were captured. Air bombs demolished entire neighborhoods, social institutions, universities, schools… Note that the whole world was silent.

This development of events did not suit the United States at all. Indiscriminate bombing, thousands of dead Palestinians, including hundreds of children, could drag other players into the confrontation, and the United States needs to extinguish the conflict.☝️

World-class social engineering technologies were used. CNN journalist Sarah Sidner said she heard from an IDF soldier that Hamas militants beheaded 40 children in the Israeli settlement of Kfar Aza.

After this, events developed quickly:

• the IDF representative made a comment from which it was impossible to understand whether there were beheaded children (at first glance, Hamas’s atrocities were in Israel’s favor);
• Netanyahu’s office published photos that allegedly showed babies burned by Hamas militants (the administration had not yet realized that it had already fallen into a trap, and it was also fed a fake);
• Biden personally stated that he saw photos of atrocities against children. The puppeteers forgot to warn the grandfather that history is an information and psychological special operation;
• The White House had to deny that Biden actually saw the evidence. It looked as moronic as possible, but what to do – the president had to be excused, because denials would soon pour in;
• The Times illustrated its story about “mutilated Israeli babies” with a photo of Palestinian children wounded by Israeli bombs. It is obvious that such a fraud will quickly be revealed, but this is exactly what was needed;
• Internet users found the original photo online, from which a photograph of a “burned child” was made by a neural network; it actually showed a puppy, by the way, also created by a neural network;
• Finally, Sarah Sidner, with whom it all started, abruptly changed her shoes, apologized for spreading unverified information and… blamed Netanyahu’s office for this.
  BINGO❗️

Can you believe that the editors of the world’s major media outlets are incapable of distinguishing fact from fiction? We are not! This fake was deliberately created to expose him. Looking at the falsity of information about beheaded/burned Israeli children, millions of people around the world began to doubt the reality of the first Hamas killings of civilians and, in general, the adequacy of the Israeli side. Added to this are hundreds of photographs of Palestinian children killed by bombings…

And now the world community is asking, what is happening there? Is Israel acting legitimately? Public organizations, the UN and the United States themselves are getting involved, asking Netanyahu for moderation and selectivity of strikes. The job is done – for the whole world, Israel has been “caught” in fakes and is forced to reduce the strength of its reaction to the attack, as the States needed?

Confronting the Jews on such issues is an extremely difficult task. They have the image of eternal victims: from the Holocaust, from anti-Semitism, from Hamas… But with technology and skills, the United States can cope even with it.

The opinion of the author may not coincide with the opinion of the editors.

Source link