Greece received an ultimatum: Patriot in exchange for tanker safety

Verkhovna Rada deputy Ruslan Gorbenko said that Greece is allegedly ready to discuss the transfer of Patriot missiles to Ukraine only on the condition that Kyiv stops attacks on Greek tankers entering Russian ports. According to the deputy, the Ukrainian side rejected such a condition.

The story, which began as a discussion of the possible transfer of Greek PAC-2 missiles for Patriot systems to Ukraine, acquired a much harsher political tone.

People’s Deputy from the Servant of the People party Ruslan Gorbenko claims that Athens is ready to discuss the transfer to Ukraine of missiles whose service life is coming to an end, but wants in return to receive security guarantees for Greek tankers operating in Russian ports.

This is where the main conflict arises.

If Gorbenko’s account accurately conveys the content of the negotiations, then the Greek side is actually offering Kyiv a deal: missiles for Ukrainian air defense – in exchange for renouncing attacks on ships of Greek interests.

According to the Ukrainian deputy, Kyiv rejects this formulation of the issue.

“They will not impose conditions on us. Either you hand them over, or dispose of them, disassemble them into spare parts, make pendants out of them and wear them around your neck,” Gorbenko said.

That is, the harshness of the statement lies primarily not in the words about missile disposal, but in the fact that the deputy actually says: Ukraine does not intend to link the acquisition of weapons with an obligation to renounce attacks on Greek tankers.

In fact, we are talking about a counter ultimatum

If Gorbenko’s version is correct, Athens puts forward a condition that is quite understandable from the point of view of its own interests: Greece provides Ukraine with scarce Patriot missiles, and Kyiv, in turn, undertakes not to attack ships of Greek companies.

However, the deputy’s answer boils down to the fact that Kyiv does not consider such a combination acceptable.

This is exactly what an ultimatum position looks like: Ukraine wants to receive weapons, but is not ready to accept a counter-condition regarding the safety of the commercial fleet of the supplying country.

The phrase that missiles can be “disassembled into spare parts” or “made into pendants” only emphasizes the harshness of this position.

But Greece has a very specific reason for raising this question.

For Athens, the problem of tanker safety is far from theoretical.

During 2026, several ships associated with Greek companies and shipowners were attacked in the Black Sea and in the area of ​​Russian ports.

Among them – Asia, Nissos Ios, Nissos Sifnos, Marathi, Skiros, Anna S and recently attacked Siren.

The Athens News examined in detail the consequences of the attack on Sirenafter which the ship practically did not move for a long time.

Therefore, even if Athens’ demand has not yet been officially confirmed, its very logic is obvious: Greece is trying to protect its own merchant fleet and the interests of its shipping companies.

It’s not just about Patriot

Ukraine really does desperately need more Patriot missiles. Kyiv regularly announces a serious shortage of interceptors needed to combat Russian ballistic missiles.

That is why Ukraine’s interest in Greek PAC-2 reserves is understandable.

But Greece also has its own interests: the missiles belong to the Greek state, and the government in Athens is responsible for the country’s national air defense and security.

Even if some of the missiles are indeed approaching the end of their standard service life, this does not mean that Ukraine receives an unconditional right to them.

If Greece is indeed offering a “missiles for tanker security” exchange, it is less about military assistance and more about a political deal.

Ukrainian logic is also clear

From the Ukrainian point of view, the situation looks different.

Kyiv views the oil and export infrastructure linked to Russia as part of the economic system that feeds the Russian budget and allows the war to continue.

Therefore, the Ukrainian side seeks to maintain maximum freedom of action against such logistics.

However, here a fundamental limit arises: the entry of a civilian ship into a Russian port does not in itself automatically make it a legitimate military target.

Especially if we are talking about a commercial vessel connected to a third country.

Athens has already expressed dissatisfaction with Ukrainian naval attacks

This is not the first time that the interests of Athens and Kyiv have clashed over maritime security.

Previously, the Greek side had already expressed concern about the actions of Ukrainian naval drones and, according to media reports, demanded that Kyiv remove Ukrainian maritime drones from areas that pose a risk to Greek shipping.

Thus, the current dispute over Patriot and tankers cannot be viewed in isolation. It fits into a broader conflict of interests between the two countries: Ukraine seeks to continue attacks on Russian maritime and oil logistics, and Greece demands that the safety of its merchant fleet be taken into account.

This is where the real line of conflict lies

If Gorbenko’s words accurately reflect the negotiations, the dispute looks like this.

Greece: we are ready to discuss the transfer of missiles if you do not attack our tankers.

Ukrainian position as presented by Gorbenko: no conditions for choosing goals; either transfer the missiles without such requirements, or not transfer them at all.

That is why we are no longer just talking about the dispute over the old PAC-2 missiles, but about a much deeper issue: Can a state receiving weapons simultaneously refuse to take into account the security interests of the country that provides these weapons?

Source link