China is taking another step towards turning the Northern Sea Route into a full-fledged trade corridor between Asia and Europe. Chinese shipping company Sea Legend is launching a regular container service from Ningbo-Zhoushan to Felixstowe in the UK along the northern coast of Russia.
The new route received the marketing name Ice Silk Road, or “Ice Silk Road”.
The main advantage of the new direction is obvious: time.
Traditional sea shipping between East China and Northern Europe takes approximately 40 days, and when bypassing conflict zones and using longer routes, it may take even more time.
The Arctic crossing can shorten the voyage by approximately 20–21 days, depending on ice and weather conditions.
The video was published in August 2026 and is dedicated specifically to the launch of the regular Sea Legend service through the Arctic.
Not through Hormuz, but bypassing Suez and the Red Sea
A number of publications describe the new route as China’s way of “bypassing the Strait of Hormuz.” This formulation requires clarification.
Major container routes between China and Europe via the Suez Canal do not pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Hormuz is primarily critical for oil and LNG exports from the Persian Gulf.
For container trade, other bottlenecks are much more important: Bab el Mandeb, Red Sea and Suez Canal.
It is them that the Northern Sea Route allows you to completely exclude from the route.
After attacks on merchant ships in the Red Sea, many carriers were forced to sail around the Cape of Good Hope, which sharply increased the duration and cost of voyages.
The Arctic route provides an alternative to both options at once: Suez and the long bypass of Africa.
The route has already been tested in 2025
The idea did not suddenly appear in the summer of 2026.
In September 2025, a container ship Istanbul Bridge, associated with Sea Legend, left Ningbo and passed through the Northern Sea Route to Felixstowe.
The transition took about 20 days, despite the delay due to weather conditions.
This was one of the first attempts to organize a virtually linear container service between China and Western Europe through the Arctic.
Now the experiment is turning into a regular service.
Flights will become weekly in 2026
Sea Legend plans to operate consecutive sailings from Ningbo-Zhoushan via the Northern Sea Route to Felixstowe during the summer/autumn navigation window.
According to industry publications, the schedule includes several weekly flights, with the last departures of the season scheduled to take place in the fall.
After Felixstowe, cargo can be diverted further to other European ports and distribution centres.
The video is also fresh and examines time savings on the new Arctic route China – Europe.
Why now
There are several reasons.
First – geopolitical instability. In recent years, the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb have ceased to be perceived by shipping companies as a guaranteed safe corridor.
The second is changes in ice conditions in the Arctic.
In the summer, sea ice recedes so much that some ships can navigate the Northern Sea Route without the constant escort of a heavy icebreaker, although ice class and special procedures remain critical.
The third reason is the growing strategic cooperation between China and Russia in the Arctic.
For Moscow, the Northern Sea Route is one of the key infrastructure projects. For Beijing, it creates an additional route to Europe that is significantly less dependent on traditional maritime chokepoints.
The Polar Silk Road has been under construction for many years
The term itself Polar Silk Road, “Polar Silk Road”, appeared in Chinese strategy long before the current voyage.
Beijing views the Arctic as an additional direction of the global One Belt, One Road initiative and is gradually increasing its scientific, energy and transport presence in the region.
Back in 2024, China began regularly transmitting ice forecasts to ships for the Northeast Passage along the Russian coast.
That is, the current regular container service is not a separate commercial experiment, but part of a much longer strategy.
But the Arctic is not yet capable of replacing Suez
Despite the impressive time difference, it is premature to talk about the imminent replacement of the Suez Canal.
The Northern Sea Route has serious restrictions.
- Seasonality. The most favorable conditions persist mainly in summer and early autumn.
- Ice. Even in summer, ice conditions can change quickly.
- Size of vessels. Not every large ocean-going container ship is suitable for Arctic navigation.
- Infrastructure. The Arctic has significantly fewer ports, repair bases, and emergency rescue capabilities.
- Insurance. Operating in polar waters creates additional risks and costs.
- Politics. A significant part of the route runs along the Russian coast and depends on interaction with Russian structures.
For comparison, thousands of large merchant ships pass through Suez every year, while the number of complete transit voyages along the Northern Sea Route is still measured in the dozens.
The Arctic is also becoming a geopolitical route
The importance of the Northern Sea Route goes far beyond containers.
Russia is already actively using it to export raw materials to Asia. This season alone, Russian oil supplies along the Arctic route to China have increased sharply.
According to Reuters, by August 11, seven shipments of Russian oil with a total volume of about 6 million barrels. This is almost half of the total volume transported by this route over the previous season.
Thus, a two-way logistics system is being formed: Russian oil, gas and raw materials go to the east, and Chinese container cargo receives a short route to the west.
There is also an environmental price
The new route has a very unpleasant paradox.
On the one hand, a shorter route can mean less fuel consumption and less CO2 emissions per specific flight.
On the other hand, the very possibility of expanding shipping arises largely because The Arctic is rapidly losing sea ice due to climate change.
Environmentalists also warn that an accident, fuel spill or fire in the Arctic is much more difficult to eliminate than on traditional transport routes.
The world’s largest carriers are still cautious about the Northern Sea Route. Some companies, including MSC and Maersk, have previously said they do not plan to use Arctic routes on a large scale due to environmental and operational risks.
Important: The Ice Silk Road is still a seasonal additional route, and not a full-fledged replacement for the Suez Canal. Its main advantage is speed between northeast Asia and northern Europe, but the scale of transport remains incomparable with traditional trade corridors.
Why is this important for Europe?
If Sea Legend’s regular flights prove commercially successful, European ports will gain another logistics corridor from China.
For Felixstowe in the UK, this means being able to receive goods from East Asia in almost half the time of the traditional sea route.
For China, the effect is much broader.
Beijing is gradually creating a system in which trade with Europe is less dependent on a single route and several vulnerable straits.
Therefore, the main point of the “Ice Silk Road” is not that China will abandon Suez tomorrow. Beijing gets another route and thereby reduces its dependence on any single maritime artery. In world trade, a backup route is often more valuable than the shortest one.
More Stories
Gas instead of Europe: Russia is preparing a route to Iran with a capacity up to Nord Stream 1 level
Souvlaki turns into luxury: in Crete, pita gyros already reaches 6.50 euros
Greek hoteliers against uniform restrictions: new tourism plan could slow down investment