Marfin case 16 years later: two suspects detained in fatal arson

16 years after the tragedy Marfin police detained two 42-year-old men. One more A 46-year-old woman is being sought on a warrant..

In Greece, there has been a dramatic turn in the case of the fatal arson of a Marfin bank branch in central Athens in 2010: police have detained two 42-year-old men, and another 46-year-old woman is being sought on a warrant.

The operation is carried out by the Directorate for Combating Organized Crime – ΔΑΟΕ. According to Protothematwo arrest warrants have already been executed, and the third defendant, a 46-year-old woman, is wanted. According to the publication, she may be in the UK.

We are talking about a case that for 16 years remained one of the most serious unclosed wounds of modern Greece. On May 5, 2010, during a mass demonstration against the first memorandum and austerity measures, unknown assailants threw Molotov cocktails at the Marfin-Egnatia Bank branch on Stadiou Street. There were employees in the building.

Three dead and one unborn child

Three bank employees died from fire and toxic smoke: 32-year-old pregnant Angeliki Papathanasopoulou, 36-year-old Epaminondas Tsakalis And 35-year-old Paraskevi Zulia. Papathanasopoulou was four months pregnant, so in Greek public memory the tragedy is often described as the death of three people and an unborn child.

According to Greek media reports and archival data, approximately 25–30 employees were in the building at the time of the attack. Some people were able to get out, some were evacuated by firefighters, but three were trapped inside and died from suffocation.

The Guardian Already on May 6, 2010, he wrote that three people died after a bank in Athens was set on fire during riots amid the Greek debt crisis. Then this tragedy instantly became a symbol of how political violence devours precisely those on whose behalf it supposedly acts.

What is known about new arrests

According to the latest reports, two 42-year-old men have been detained. Warrants have been issued against them as part of a new phase of the investigation. Another 46-year-old woman is wanted for possible involvement in the same attack.

Official detailed information from the police is still awaited at the time of writing. Therefore, now it is important not to turn those detained into already convicted ones. They are suspects/accused on warrants and their guilt must be proven in court. This is a boring legal phrase, but without it any state quickly slides into a square with torches. And this business already has too much fire.

According to Greek media, Operation ΔΑΟΕ remains under development and investigations are ongoing. Official information from the competent authorities is awaited.

Why the case remained an open wound

Marfin became not just a criminal case, but a political and moral symbol. On the day of the general strike and mass protests against austerity measures, a group of people attacked the bank, where employees continued to work inside. Molotov cocktails, smoke, panic, closed exits, inability to get out – and three people who died not at the front or in a clash, but at work.

For Greek society, this was a confrontation with a simple and terrible truth: violence covered by political slogans does not choose the “right” goals. It kills random people, workers, a pregnant woman, those who just came to work in the morning. And then for years he hides behind masks, collective irresponsibility and the phrase “persons unknown.”

In 2021, the Ministry of Citizen Protection announced the resumption of the investigation into the Marfin case, indicating that the Athens prosecutor’s office was reopening material about the fatal arson. A state agency wrote about this then ΑΜΝΑ. Now, years after this decision, the first new arrests have appeared.

Old trials and old acquittals

The judicial history of the case was difficult and controversial. In 2013, some of the bank’s managers were convicted in the first instance for insufficient fire safety measures and violation of duties to protect employees. However, later, in the second instance, the court acquitted them, finding that the identified violations were not in direct causal connection with the death of the employees.

Separately, charges were considered against two individuals who were associated with the arson itself. They were unanimously acquitted in 2016 due to insufficient evidence. The direct perpetrators of the attack thus remained officially unidentified for many years.

That is why the current detentions are of particular importance. If the investigation does indeed obtain new evidence, it could be a turnaround in a case that for too long has looked like a monument to state impotence. If the evidence base turns out to be weak, this will be another blow to the families of the victims and to confidence in justice. It’s wonderful when, 16 years later, the system still demands that its word be taken.

The case should not become a political trophy

The danger is now obvious: Marfin could again be turned into a political tool. Some will try to prove that “everything was known from the very beginning.” Others say that the arrests are a belated demonstrative action. Still others are that the case should be used to attack all left-wing, anarchist or anti-government protest.

But the focus of this story should not be parties, ideological camps or television shouting. In the center are three dead people and the question of who threw fire into the building where there were living people.

Political violence loves to dissolve responsibility into the crowd. “There was a demonstration,” “there was chaos,” “there were unknown people,” “everyone was screaming,” “no one saw.” It’s a convenient smokescreen. But the Molotov cocktail is thrown by a specific hand. The door is set on fire by a specific person. And the consequences are then borne for decades by the families of the victims, not by those hiding in a common mask.

What remains to be discovered

Now investigators have to explain what new data the warrants are based on. This could be witness testimony, new examinations, revision of old materials, digital traces, connections between persons involved, or new operational data. Without this, society will again face the familiar Greek ritual: a loud statement, cameras, handcuffs, and then years of silence in court.

The issue of evidence is especially important after such a long time. The events took place in 2010. Witness memory weakens, participants change testimony, materials become outdated, and the political background changes. Therefore, the case should be collected not on emotions, but on an iron-clad evidence base.

If the prosecution wants to stand trial, it must show not just the political context and moral obviousness of the crime, but the specific connection of specific individuals with specific actions. Otherwise, Marfin will again remain not a solved case, but a national trauma with another date on the calendar.

Main conclusion

The new arrests in the Marfin case are the first major turn in years in the investigation into the arson that killed three bank employees in 2010. Two 42-year-old men have been detained and another 46-year-old woman is being sought on a warrant.

But the real test will begin not at the time of arrest, but in court. It is there that it will become clear whether the investigation has evidence that can withstand 16 years of silence, previous justifications and the political burden of this case.

Marfin cannot be buried again under the words “the investigation is ongoing.” And it cannot be used again as a cudgel in an ideological fight. This case should receive only one thing: facts, evidence, a trial and an answer to the question of who set fire to the bank with people inside. Everything else is smoke. And there was already enough smoke in this story.

Source link