October 13, 2026

Athens News

News in English from Greece

Survivor reality show contestant arrested for beating 14-year-old Gypsy who stole his money and mobile phone


Menidi: case of theft from a pastry shop of a former participant Survivor turned into accusations in the beating of a 14-year-old teenager. The video from the store added questions, but did not remove the main thing: where does self-defense end and lynching begin?

In Menidi a story broke out that mixed theft, a chase, accusations of beating a minor and a question that Greek society is again answering nervously: what to do when petty crime becomes commonplace, and citizens stop believing that the police will get there before their own fists?

Former reality TV contestant Survivor and the owner of a candy store Costas Papadopoulos was detained after an incident with 14 year old teenagerwhich suspected of stealing from his store. The teenager himself claims that Papadopoulos beat him, hitting him in the head with keys used as brass knuckles, and then allegedly placed him in the trunk of a car.

Papadopoulos denies any wrongdoing. According to him, a group of Roma minors in a short time went into his candy store several times and stole things. He claims that in one of these episodes, an employee’s mobile phone was stolen, and earlier, his mother’s bag with a phone, wallet, money and documents was stolen.

Published surveillance videoaccording to Greek media, shows the moment minors enter a pastry shop in Menidi. After that, Papadopoulos allegedly realized what was happening, began a pursuit and detained one of the teenagers a few streets later.

Two versions of one incident

Papadopoulos said he did not hit the teenager. He claims that during the chase, one of the minors fell into a ditch with garbage and that’s when he received a head injury. Papadopoulos himself says he picked the teenager up, put him in the back of his seven-seater car and was going to take him to the police.

On a Greek broadcast he said: “These children are Roma. They entered my store three times in 24 hours. The third time they took the saleswoman’s phone number. I knew the route they were taking because I had found my mother’s bag in the trash the day before. I followed them and caught up with them after 100–200 meters. I didn’t hit him”.

According to him, the employee’s stolen phone was lying next to the teenager after the fall. Papadopoulos also claims that he released the minor after he asked not to take him to the police and promised to return another phone that had been stolen earlier.

Teen Lawyer Georgios Kriemadis gives the opposite version. He claims the 14-year-old had two serious head wounds and was taken by ambulance to hospital where he received more than ten stitches. According to the lawyer, even if the theory of theft was confirmed, this did not give an adult the right to beat a child.

This is where the nasty part comes in, where slogans are useless. If there was a theft, it is a crime. If there was a beating of a minor, this is also a crime. One does not cancel the other. A citizen has the right to protect his property and detain a suspect until the police arrive, but does not receive a license for street justice along with this. The state, by the way, also does not receive an indulgence for the fact that people are already so tired of repeated thefts that they begin to act on their own.

What is stated in the case materials

According to the case file, the father of a 14-year-old reported to police that the owner of the business hit his son and placed him in a car for a period of time. The teenager was taken to a children’s hospital for first aid.

During the preliminary investigation, it was reportedly determined that shortly before the incident, the 14-year-old, along with another minor, entered Papadopoulos’ store and stole an employee’s cell phone. The saleswoman then notified the owner, who began pursuit.

An episode from the previous day appears separately in the case. According to Papadopoulos, two teenage gypsies entered his store and stole his mother’s bag. It contained a mobile phone, a wallet with 80 euros and personal documents. Later, some of the things were found thrown away nearby.

The police formed a case and transferred it to the prosecutor’s office. Papadopoulos himself was brought to court in the complex Evelpidon. He faces charges related to causing bodily injury to a minor and unlawful coercion. The teenager, in turn, is also involved in the case of theft, committed jointly and repeatedly, together with an unidentified accomplice.

Editorial comment

In this story, it is important not to confuse the two issues. The first is what exactly happened between Costas Papadopoulos and a 14-year-old teenager. This should establish the investigation: whether the injuries were the result of a fall, forceful detention or beating. Here, the court cannot be replaced by either emotions or television versions.

But there is a second question, which is often spoken of in whispers in Greece, although the inhabitants Menidi, Acharnes and neighboring areas have been facing it for years. We are talking about criminalized groups of minors inside parts of the Roma settlements, who regularly go around shops, looking for what they can steal, and are well aware that there will be almost no real punishment for petty thefts.

The problem is not the origin as such. The problem is that the state has created a gray zone where juvenile crime actually reproduces without consequences. Minors are not punished like adults, parents are formally fined, there is often nothing to recover from them, and shops, kiosks and small family businesses are left to face constant thefts.

In such a system, sooner or later lynching appears. Not because it is legal or acceptable, but because people stop believing in the defense. An entrepreneur who has been robbed several times begins to act on his own: catch up, detain, take away what is his. And at this moment, the line between protecting property and a criminal case against the victim himself becomes dangerously thin.

If version Papadopoulos If confirmed, this will be a story not only about the possible theft and detention of a teenager, but also about the powerlessness of the state in the face of petty but systemic crime. If the teenager’s version is confirmed, it will be a story of violence against a minor. But in both cases the main question remains the same: Why are residents of entire neighborhoods forced to choose between patience, fear, and homemade justice?





Source link