UAP as a distraction: Professor Jiang calls ‘UFO disclosure’ manipulation

Amid a new wave of talk about UFO, UAP and the supposedly upcoming “disclosure of the UFO secret”, Professor Jiang made a harsh statement: there are no aliens or extraterrestrial technologies, and this whole story looks like a carefully constructed information screen.

According to him, the public is again being asked to look to the sky precisely when too many inconvenient questions are piling up on the ground: IranMiddle East, crisis of confidence in American policy, case Epsteineconomic instability and Washington’s increasingly aggressive foreign policy.

Professor Jiang says aliens aren’t real and “UFO Disclosure” is a distraction

“You have this UFO disclosure which everyone knows is nonsense, everyone knows its BS.

There are no aliens, there’s no alien technology. It’s just a hallucination.” pic.twitter.com/cc6ldaspjo

— Red Panda Koala (@RedPandaKoala) May 21, 2026

“Everyone knows this is nonsense”

Professor Jiang did not choose diplomatic formulations. He stated that the so-called “UFO disclosure” has nothing to do with science and looks like an artificially created mass illusion.

“You have all this supposed UFO disclosure and everyone knows it’s nonsense. Everyone knows this is nonsense.”– said the professor.

According to him, behind loud statements about “inhuman technologies” there is nothing but a media construction:

“There are no aliens, there is no extraterrestrial technology. It’s just an artificially created illusion.”.

When Iran is Inconvenient, UFOs Appear

It is especially significant that the new wave of talk about UFO coincided with an extremely tense period around Iran. When the foreign policy line Donald Trump and his administration begins to raise too many questions, the topic of “secret objects” in the sky becomes an almost perfect smokescreen.

Instead of discussing who made the decisions on Iran, who is responsible for the consequences of the pressure on the region and why the situation is once again spiraling out of control, the public is treated to the same old circus act: mysterious videos, “secret programs”, former intelligence officers, strange objects and the promise of a great reveal.

It’s convenient. While people argue about aliens, less attention is left to questions about war, oil, sanctions, arms deals, debt, failures of diplomacy and those decisions that are made not in space, but in very earthly offices.

Big distraction

The scheme is indecently simple: the more real problems, the more emotional noise. The UFO theme is perfect for this operation because it has everything modern media loves:

• secret;
• fear;
• secrecy;
• a feeling of forbidden truth;
• endless room for speculation.

And most importantly, nothing needs to be proven definitively. Enough hints, murky footage, phrases from former officials and promises that “everything will become known soon.” Soon, of course, never comes. We settled down comfortably, as usual.

Editorial comment

The story with UFO today looks less and less like a scientific discussion and more and more like an attention management tool. A topic that had been ridiculed for decades suddenly became almost official: hearings, statements, former intelligence officers, military pilots and endless talk of the “hidden truth.”

This does not prove the existence of aliens. But it perfectly shows that the topic itself has become politically useful to someone.

In the case of the administration Trump it looks especially distinctive. When questions pile up Iranthe Middle East, military decisions and the consequences of American policy, the information field suddenly begins to fill with stories about mysterious objects. What a touching coincidence, almost like the sudden concern of officials for the truth.

The problem isn’t whether someone believes in aliens. The problem is that the public is being pulled back into a discussion of convenient sensationalism while the real decisions are being made away from the public eye.

This is exactly how modern information policy works: it is not necessary to prohibit an important topic. It is enough to drown her in a louder, more mysterious and more emotional story.

Conclusion: Perhaps Professor Jiang is speaking too harshly. But it gets one thing right: the UFO theme has become too convenient, too timely, and too useful for those who need to distract attention from earthly failures. The public is once again invited to look to the sky – precisely when the most important issues are on the ground.

Source link