The Iranian actress could cause a scandal in the relationship between the Macron spouses

New book by a French journalist again raised rumors around Emmanuel Macron, Brigitte Macron and Iranian actress Golshifteh Farahani.

The name of the Iranian-French actress Golshifteh Farahani unexpectedly found itself at the center of a new scandal surrounding the French presidential couple. In the journalist’s book Floriana Tardif “Un couple (presque) parfait” it is alleged that it was the messages related to the actress that could have caused the tense episode between Emmanuel And Brigitte Macroncaught on video during the president’s foreign trip.

We are talking about the sensational moment when the cameras recorded a sudden movement Brigitte Macron towards the face of the French President before leaving the plane. First in Elysee Palace they tried to present the episode as a humorous gesture or an everyday misunderstanding, but a new book has brought the story back to the headlines of French and international media.

According to euronewsauthor of the book Florian Tardifjournalist Paris Matchclaims that Emmanuel Macron And Golshifteh Farahani there was some “platonic connection”. According to Tardif, this version was allegedly repeatedly confirmed to him by people close to the presidential couple.

According to publications, the book talks about messages where the actress was mentioned in a complimentary context. In particular, a number of retellings claim that the French President could write that he considers her “very beautiful”. It was these messages, according to the author of the book, that allegedly caused irritation Brigitte Macron and caused tension between the spouses.

Fransa Cumhurbaşkanı Emmanuel Macron ile eşi Brigitte Macron’a ait olduğu bildirilen görüntüler sosyal medyada gündem oldu

▪️ Vietnam’da uçaktan iniş esnasında kapısının açılmasıyla kırmızı ceketli birinin eli, Emmanuel Macron

▪️Görüntülerin devamında… pic.twitter.com/CXkfJehArt

— Anadolu Ajansı (@anadoluajansi) May 26, 2025

It is important to emphasize: this is not an established fact, but a statement by the author of the book and a retelling of sources that have not been officially confirmed. Representatives Brigitte Macron have already rejected this version, saying that she does not check her husband’s phone and that such allegations have been previously refuted. Writes about this The Independent. Well, the tabloid volcano is spewing lava again, and journalism has to walk around it in a hard hat.

Who is Golshifteh Farahani

Golshifteh Farahani is an Iranian and French actress with an international career. She was born in Tehran in the family of a theater director and actor Behzada Farahani and actresses Fahima Rahimini. Her sister Shagaeg Farahani is also an actress.

Since childhood, Farahani has been involved in music: at the age of five she began playing the piano. Later, her interest increasingly shifted to the acting profession. She came to cinema as a teenager and quite early became a prominent figure in Iranian cinema.

International fame came to her after participating in the film Ridley Scott Body of Lieswhere she starred with Leonardo DiCaprio And Russell Crowe. After this, her relations with the Iranian authorities deteriorated sharply. As noted The Guardianthe actress actually found herself in exile and has been living in France since 2009.

She later starred in films Paterson, Exodus: Gods and Kings, Pirates of the Caribbean: Salazar’s Revenge, Extraction And Extraction 2. Farahani is also known for her public stance in support of women’s rights in Iran and her criticism of the Iranian regime.

Why did this story become so loud?

The version itself is about “platonic connection” could have remained just another fragment of French political chronicle, if not for two circumstances. Firstly, we are talking about the President of France and the First Lady. Secondly, the scandal overlapped with a video that had already gone viral and given rise to many interpretations.

The French presidential couple has long been under constant media attention. Any gesture, facial expression or awkward moment immediately turns into material for comments, memes and rumors. In this sense, the book Tardif found herself in a ready-made information environment, where the public is waiting not so much for facts, but for an explanation for the picture they have already seen.

The figure is also of particular interest Golshifteh Farahani. She is not just an actress, but a vivid symbol of Iranian cultural emigration, women’s freedom and resistance to the regime. Therefore, her name is in the political and family scandal around Macron instantly added an international flavor to the story.

At the same time, the actress herself is not a participant in a public conflict in the sense in which the tabloids are trying to present her. The main source of the whole story is a book by a French journalist and statements about messages allegedly seen Brigitte Macron. There is no official confirmation of any romantic connection.

What the book says and what remains a rumor

According to Varietyin the book Tardif this is exactly what we’re talking about “platonic” relationship, not a proven romance. The author argues that this relationship may have continued for some time and that it became a source of jealousy within the presidential couple.

International publications retell harsher versions of this story, but a reliable factual base remains limited. There is a book, there are statements by the author, there is a retelling of unnamed sources, there is a video recording of an awkward episode, and there is an official denial from the first lady’s entourage.

That is why it is more correct to present this story not as a proven fact about the president’s personal life, but as a new media revolution around the book and rumors. Otherwise, journalism turns into sending other people’s speculations with a beautiful cover. And this, oddly enough, is still not a profession, although many are trying.

Editorial comment

History with Macron, Brigitte And Farahani looks primarily as an example of how the personal life of politicians turns into a political performance. While there is no independent confirmation of Tardif’s version, it should be taken as a loud statement by the author of the book, and not as a proven fact. But the resonance itself shows that in the era of viral videos, one gesture can sometimes destroy the official narrative faster than any opposition campaign.

Source link