The US is betting on Greece in the energy confrontation with Russia

Greece found itself at the center of the American strategy to increase energy supplies to Eastern And Central Europe.

This was stated by the executive director US National Energy Sovereignty Council Jarrod Eigen, commenting on plans to develop the so-called Vertical gas corridor.

The corresponding statements were made during the fund’s event Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington, dedicated to the state of US energy policy. The discussion centered on natural gas supply routes through Bulgaria And Romania in a northerly direction.

According to Eigen, we are talking about long-term agreements for a period of ten to twenty years. A new meeting with the participation of the countries participating in the project is planned in the United States at the end of February, which should take place before the conference CERAWeek in Houston and result in additional obligations.

He noted that during contacts in Athens the American side sought specific agreements rather than formal declarations. As Eigen emphasized, the goal is to direct push back Russia from the European market.

Greeceaccording to him, showed itself as “exclusively supportive” both at the government and corporate level. He pointed to large-scale work to expand terminals, develop LNG infrastructure and create floating regasification units.

It was separately noted that there is “strong readiness” on the part of Greek private companies to cooperate with American partners in the energy sector.

At the same time, Eigen emphasized that further development of the project is impossible without increasing the capacity of routes through Bulgaria And Romania. According to him, the increase in supply volumes assumes the unhindered movement of gas to the north of Europe.

Consultations are also planned in the near future with Ukraineto create a unified supply architecture and transform Vertical corridor V practically functioning energy route.

Thus, Greece is increasingly establishing itself as a key US energy hub in the region, connecting American LNG with the markets of Eastern and Central Europe.

In the end Europe really reduces dependence on one supplierbut in return receives: more expensive energy, weaker industry and a new form of external dependence.

Under the guise of “energy security,” markets are being redistributed, competitors are weakened, and control over the economy is strengthened. EU. And the main paradox is that in this scheme it is not European consumers or industry who benefit, but external suppliers and financial centers.

For Europe itself, this means a long-term loss of competitiveness and a gradual transformation from the industrial core of the world into a sales market and a zone of political influence.

Source link