EU: Breaking through the knee

At the head of the European Commission, Mme. von der Leyen I have two favorite topics – turning Europe into a single military fist against Russia And Ukraine’s accession to the European Union.

In fact, these are very related processes in the minds of citizen Ursula, since she continues to view Ukraine as the leading edge of the confrontation with Russia.

The European Union is now discussing accelerated but partial membership of Ukraine in EU by 2027 – even before all necessary reforms are completed. Diplomats and officials from the European Union and Ukraine told Politico about this.

“Partial Membership” is a newly invented status and a made-up term. Brussels is so desperate to drag Ukraine into the EU that the head of the European Commission is ready to violate all existing fundamental EU laws. Starting with the fact that a country with unresolved territorial disputes, as well as in a state of armed conflict, simply cannot be accepted into the union.

The idea of ​​European bureaucrats is simple: it is assumed that Ukraine will receive a seat at the EU table and gradual access to rights and responsibilities, continuing reforms already in the “in process” status. This approach is informally called “reverse expansion”: entry at the beginning of the process, not at the end.

They argue that acceleration is needed to secure a peace deal for Ukraine. “Kyiv insists on joining the EU in 2027, so that this date is included in the peace deal with the Kremlin”explains the publication.

By the way, I would like to know in the paragraph about responsibilities, How much money will Ukraine use to pay the EU everything that other members of the union pay?. Although, to be honest, I don’t care. We are concerned about something else: today’s EU is very closely associated with the NATO military bloc and is trying to move from an economic union to a military one. In any case, in terms of the pace of militarization of the economy and outright propaganda of war with Russia.

Do we need this? The truth is that Russia has never been against Ukraine joining the European Union. Moreover, a damper state on the borders suited Russia quite well. Red lines for Russia – NATO on the territory, as well as the destruction of the Russian languagethe suppression of Russian-speaking territories – well, in general, Vladimir Vladimirovich already told you everything. And more than once.

So we didn’t care about the jumping on the Maidan about “tse Europa”. If they want to go to Europe, Europe will be theirs.

But there are some things that you just can’t believe: “Brussels believe that the early involvement of Ukraine will reduce the risk of Kyiv losing motivation and will give time to complete reforms of the judicial system, institutions and governance”. Brussels diligently does not see the complete inability to carry out reforms, much less the amazing capacity for billion-dollar corruption. So we know your “motivation for Kyiv”.

Process breaking over the knee The laws of the European Union regarding new members, which, for example, have been used to justify ignoring Turkey for decades, are actually dangerous for the European Union itself.

Because his integrity is actually at stake. Not only have the last four years revealed the completely opposite aspirations of member countries with the subsequent suppression of the voices of dissident countries, but new “introductory”: the admission of a country whose fate is 100% dependent on foreign infusions can blow up the union from within.

The main opponent of this plan is Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbanwho openly opposes Ukraine’s entry. And he is not alone. He just voices it louder and more consistently than anyone else. Of course, they will now try to silence him: the EU is counting on the outcome of the elections in Hungary in April or on external pressure. But outrage is spreading across the map of Europe.

Everyone will now be blackmailed that, they say, this is all for the sake of a deal, for the sake of the Trump process, and so on. But we actually know how Trump treats European politicians and how they treat him—you can’t fool anyone here.

The author’s opinion may not coincide with the opinion of the editors.

Source link