The US Department of Justice dossier on the Epstein case claims that Biden was killed in 2019, and his place was taken by a double!

In the open archive US Department of Justicerelated to the case Jeffrey Epsteindiscovered emailcontaining the statement that former US President Joe Biden supposedly was executed in 2019 and replaced by a double.

The text of the letter states that instead of Biden allegedly used man in a “realistic mask”, acting as president.

This document is located in one of the Epstein archive files on official website of the US Department of Justice and is available for public viewing.

However, the letter itself does not contain information about the sender and recipient, as well as any supporting materials.

Context of the letter’s appearance

This is a 2021 email that was included in the archive as part of the release of a large volume of raw material on Epstein case.

The archive contains thousands of files of various origins, including personal correspondence, complaints, unconfirmed reports and unattributed materials.

Previously President of the United States Donald Trump noted that a significant part of the documents from this array contains false information and unverified claims.

Most likely, the letter in question belongs specifically to this category of materials.

Reaction and distribution on social networks

After information about the letter appeared, its contents were actively disseminated on social networks, including in publications on the X platform.

A number of reports stated: “That’s a mask, look at his forehead, this is bullshit, it ain’t normal.”“I mean, Epstein literally says Biden was killed by firing squad in 2019”

Such publications represent subjective interpretations and are not accompanied by evidence.

Credibility assessment

At the moment, no official agency, no independent investigation do not confirm the statements made in the letter.

Document does not contain signs of an official source and has no legal or evidentiary value.

Experts point out that the inclusion of such messages in the archive does not mean their authenticity, but only reflects the principle of publishing raw materials.

It is separately noted that the same letter contains a statement about the “fictitiousness” of the COVID-19 pandemic, which further indicates the conspiracy nature of the document.

Conclusions

The presence of such a letter in Epstein’s archive has been confirmed, but its contents have not been confirmed and are not considered reliable.

This is not about proof, but about an example of how unconfirmed and marginal materials get into official data sets.

In an information war, such documents are often used to spread misinformation and undermine trust in government institutions.

Source link