Predator: EΥP affiliated employee of EL.ΑΣ. dismissed for following orders from management

As part of personnel assessment procedures in ΕΛ.ΑΣ. (Greek Police) officer was dismissed Gospels of Georkopoulouwhose name was associated with the scandal telephone wiretapswhich shook the Greek political system.

We are talking about a police officer who, during her business trip to ΕΥΠ (Greek National Intelligence Service) signed, among other things, an order on removing the secrecy of communication, from the chairman’s mobile phone ΠΑΣΟΚ (Panhellenic Socialist Movement) Nikos Androulakis, after which he and hundreds of others, was established acquired illegal Predator spyware.

It was this document that became one of the key elements of the so-called Predator scandal. At the same time, allegations that appeared in the media about the direct participation of Georgakopoulou and a narrow circle of her subordinates in the use illegal Predator software were never proven in court. However, in Media employee testimony surfaced ΕΥΠwho were ordered to destroy all traces of this scam.

After public and international resonance Georgakopoulou’s business trip to ΕΥΠ was terminated, she returned to ΕΛ.ΑΣ.and then – during the next “crises of directors” – was finally dismissed.

However, beyond the official formulations, a key question remains decision-making hierarchy. According to data repeatedly published in Greek and international media, Georgakopoulou did not act on her own initiative, but performed orders from higher management.

According to these publications, the corresponding instruction came from Head of the Prime Minister’s Office Grigoris Dimitriadis — nephew of the prime minister Kyriakos Mitsotakiswho was then a political curator ΕΥΠ and occupied a key position in the decision-making system at that time.

Dimitriadis, in turn, reported directly head of governmentwhich builds a clear vertical of political responsibilitygoing far beyond both ΕΛ.ΑΣ.so ΕΥΠ.

In this context, the resignation of Georgakopoulou is increasingly seen as an example institutional scapegoat: responsibility is concentrated on a middle-level figure, while those who formed the political and managerial decision-making context remain free of consequences.

In fact, we are talking about a situation in which execution of a potentially illegal order becomes the basis for personal punishment of the performer, but not for a systematic assessment of the responsibility of those who gave this order. As a result, the scandal is formally “closed” by personnel decisions, but in essence it only deepens, acquiring the character crisis of democratic control.

Source link