Greenland precedent: why Athens is nervous about the Aegean Sea

After statements about agreement to acquire Greenland (in fact, its most significant part) from the outside USAwhich was announced D. Trumpan unpleasant but logical question arises: what does this mean for Aegean Sea and the Greek-Turkish agenda.

The logic of the text is simple and cynical: if a huge territory seems Greenland is capable of changing the “master” without war, then a regime is launched in the world where rules and “do not touch” signs suddenly turn into scratch paper. Denmark at the same time – not an enemy, but an ally USAwhich makes the example itself even more toxic: “partners” can also be moved if it is beneficial and if there is political will.

The author of the text calls it bad precedent and describes the advent of an era where personal relationshipsand not just contracts, procedures and the usual “red lines”. This box emphasizes that D. Trump publicly and more than once indicated his sympathy for R. T. Erdogan and called him friend. But with Kyriakos Mitsotakisas they say “politely”, their political and personal “auras” do not match.

Separately, I am reminded of the old story around Dodecanese: in the American position the demand historically emerges demilitarizationand in these matters Washingtonaccording to the author, often sounds closer to Turkish arguments. A dispute about the legal basis is also mentioned: 1947 Paris Agreement, Treaty of Lausanneand also that, as stated in the text, USA do not accept the Greek interpretation rights to self-defense islands under Article 51 of the Charter UN.

A conclusion that pushes the reader to alarm: if “Greenland can change hands,” then Aegean Topics look especially vulnerable granite formulations about the status of the islands and rocks that Türkiye regularly challenges.

Why Athens is distancing itself from Trump’s Peace Council

The text also links the Greco-Turkish perspective to the idea supranational mechanism that could “intervene” in other conflicts, not only Gaza. That is why the position is highlighted separately Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the head of the foreign policy department Giorgos Gerapetritiswhich did, as noted, “serious and balanced” statement of why Greece does not want to participate in the proposed format.

Below are key quotes in Russian translation:

• “Greece expresses reservations regarding its participation in the Peace Council proposed by American President Donald Trump and will act in unison with Europe.”
• “The proposal that has been made concerns not only Gaza, but conflicts in general and has permanent characteristics, therefore there is a distance between the resolution and the Peace Council.”
• “Strategic relations with the United States are excellent”while, according to him, “Greenland belongs to a member state EUand the threat to its sovereignty will be met with an EU response.”
• “We need to be very careful with the ‘might is right’ because what we have today sets precedents for the future. For Greece there is only the path of universality of international law.”

The political logic that the author applies to these formulations is extremely straightforward: participation in such a body would mean recognition of its authority to deal with Greek-Turkish disputes. And if the “life chairman” – D. Trumpwho, in his own words, is friends with R. T. ErdoganThat “the deck will be marked”.

It is added that this line is strategic choiceand what is mentioned as a support France And E. Macronalthough the question of the sufficiency of such support “against the power of the United States and Turkey” is left open.

Final remark: Türkiyeaccording to the text, requires much more than just a discussion EEZ And continental shelfand that’s why “talk about everything” looks like Athens potentially dangerous.

The author’s opinion may not coincide with the opinion of the editors.

Source link