Fitch warns: Greenland crisis could lead to a downgrade in Europe’s ratings

International rating agency Fitch warned about the risk massive downgrades of credit ratings European countries in the event of an escalation of the conflict with USA around Greenland and possible weakening NATO.

As stated to the agency Reuters chief analyst Fitch according to sovereign ratings James LongsonEurope may face a wave of downgrades by one rating levelif tensions develop into a systemic crisis within the North Atlantic Alliance.

According to him, Fitch is already taking a similar approach to regions with high geopolitical risksincluding Israel, Taiwan And South Koreawhere the ratings are adjusted to take into account the unstable security situation.

“We can use the same tool in relation to Europe if NATO’s defense architecture will be weakened»Longson noted, emphasizing that the decision will require careful evaluation.

Particularly vulnerable, according to Fitchare countries Eastern Europe. The key factor in decision making will be geographical proximity to Russia. “The basic rule is simple: the closer a country is to Russia, the higher the risk of negative rating impact,” – the analyst explained.

At the same time, Fitch considers it unlikely that a possible crisis around Greenland will affect Denmark credit rating. Prime Minister of the country Mette Frederiksen previously warned that a conflict with the United States over Greenland could undermine the very foundation of NATO, but the agency remains confident in the sustainability of Danish finances.

Denmark is included in a narrow circle of European countries with a rating AAAalong with Germany, Switzerland And Norwayand is characterized by one of the lowest levels of public debt in the world.

“Greenland is a huge territory in terms of geography, but economically and budgetarily it is too smallto have a noticeable impact on Denmark’s sovereign rating.” – concluded Longson.

Editorial comment

The Greenland story is quickly ceasing to be an exotic ice dispute and becoming testing the real limits of Western solidarity. In theory NATO – a union of equals. In practice, it turns out that equality ends where it begins. US strategic interests.

Donald Trump in this logic it acts extremely consistently. He does not think in terms of unions, he thinks in terms of benefits, leverage and pressure. If European countries decide to send military personnel to Greenland without agreement with Washington, this will be perceived not as a “defensive initiative”, but as insubordination.

And here it is important to understand: sanctions are not the first tool. This is already the extreme stage of the conflict. Look much more dangerous and effective duties. They do not require loud formulations, do not formally destroy alliances and do not need moral justification. Tariffs can be framed as caring for the American worker rather than as punishment for allies.

For Europe, the problem is made worse by the fact that the impact will be asymmetrical. Not for everyone at once, but for those who are weaker, louder or more economically vulnerable. This automatically triggers an internal split: some countries will begin to retreat, others will accuse them of betrayal, and others will pretend that “this does not concern them.”

Greenland in this design is only occasion. The real question is much broader: is Europe ready to act as an actor or is it still a space where decisions are made overseas and consequences are distributed internally? EU.

For now, the answer looks alarmingly simple: Europe argues, the US acts. And if this balance does not change, talk about strategic autonomy will remain what it has always been – beautiful words for the Brussels declarations.

Source link