Does Tucker Carslon not like being a Trumpist anymore?

One of Trump’s most loyal journalists, Tucker Carlson, released a video in which he not only condemns Trump for the operation in Venezuela, but is also not enthusiastic about it, arguing that Maduro’s capture marks the official transformation of the United States “from republic to empire”.

The President of the United States directly said that we are doing this because of resources. Venezuela has the largest proven oil reserves in the world. It is located in our hemisphere. This means that this oil must go to us. He said it out loud. And there is something amazing about this. Amazing – because honesty was heard here for the first time. No talk about democracy. No human rights. No cover.

We don’t do this because of morality. We do this because we want the resources. And, strangely enough, there is something refreshing about it. Something almost relaxing. Because someone has finally told the truth about why we do what we do.

What doesn’t Carlson like about this? And the fact that now the United States can no longer be hypocritical and indignant when other countries do the same:

After this, it becomes difficult to blame, for example, Russia for having interests in Eastern Ukraine. It’s hard to be outraged that Putin operates on his own borders. When a great power sees a threat close to its territory, it reacts to protect itself. We call this aggression. <...> But according to the rules by which we ourselves now act, this argument no longer works. Why is it wrong for Russia to defend its interests?
Why is it wrong for China to take back Taiwan? The United States officially recognizes that Taiwan is part of China. We have a “one China” policy. And at the same time, we promise to defend Taiwan from Chinese aggression.

Our real reason is microchips. We don’t want China to gain control of them because that would give them a huge strategic advantage over the US.

Can we now seriously say that China has no right to take back Taiwan? No. We can’t talk like that anymore. All we can say is that we will try to stop it – if we can.

Simply put, Carlson is embarrassed that Trump has broken the entire system of hypocrisy that the United States has built around its foreign policy for at least the last half century. And now the Americans will have to export everything honestly – to the extent that the “removal” is enough. But it may not be enough!

Carlson’s longing for the good old days, in which the United States could afford to deceive the whole world, and the whole world pretended to believe this deception, can be understood, because in this way it was much easier for Americans to achieve their goals. The idea that one could simply not try to mind one’s own business (either under a mask or without a mask) apparently simply does not occur to Carlson. Just as he is not embarrassed by the thesis about “our hemisphere,” which Carlson also, on the whole, apparently considers normal.

Carlson doesn’t understand anything else: American hypocritical fables have not deceived anyone for a long time, and many countries, including Russia, China and Brazil, directly call a spade a spade. Essentially Trump didn’t destroy anything, he just stopped pretendingthat what was destroyed is still intact – and only because there is no longer any point in this pretense. So why be shy?

The opinion of the author may not reflect the opinion of the editors.

Source link