January 24, 2026

Athens News

News in English from Greece

Türkiye: “We shot down a drone over the Black Sea”


Turkish Armed Forces on Monday December 15reported destruction of an unmanned aerial vehicle over Black Seawhich was approaching Turkish airspace With north direction.

In the statement Ministry of Defense of Turkey It is noted that the discovered drone was taken under observation in accordance with established procedures.

“In order to ensure airspace security were sent to the area F-16 fightersinvolved in the framework NATO and national forces that carried out immediate response task.

The aircraft was identified as unmanned and recognized uncontrollable. To avoid possible negative consequences, he was destroyed in a safe areaoutside populated areas,” the message says.

Editor’s comment

Drone incidentshot down by Turkey over the Black Sea in the midst of negotiations in Berlin, looks too perfectly timed to be an accident. The lack of official information about the origin of the drone only increases questions rather than solving them.

1. Ukraine is the most obvious and logical option

Not because they are “bad”, but because perfect timing:

  • negotiations are underway in Berlin;
  • increased nervousness on all sides;
  • The Black Sea is a zone of constant “gray” activity;
  • unmarked drone;
  • Ankara does not name the source.

The key point is that the blow was not on Russia, but indirectly towards Turkey and NATO. This is a classic signal: “the process is going in the wrong direction – let’s complicate it”.

It was no coincidence that Ukrainian opposition Telegram channels warned about possible provocations during the negotiations. This is a standard practice when some of the elites or security forces are not interested in compromise. In such cases, a drone is the cheapest and most convenient argument.

2. Third party black operation

Less likely, but cannot be completely ruled out. We can talk about:

  • private structure;
  • proxy group;
  • intelligence, for example MI6, working “for noise” and not for results.

The goal is simple: create an incident without a signature so that Türkiye tensed, Russia received a reason for statementsand the negotiating background became toxic. However, such operations usually leave at least indirect hints. There are none here.

3. Russia

The weakest scenario. Moscow has no reason:

  • expose yourself to Turkey;
  • give Ankara a formal reason to strengthen its air defense;
  • ruining the moment when diplomatic pressure plays into her hands.

There is no logic in this. Russia is now winning precisely in the following format: “We are for negotiations, they are for chaos”.

4. “Lost”

Press release version. In reality, drones do not fly towards Turkey “accidentally” at the moment of international negotiations.

Why is Türkiye silent about its origin?

This is a key marker. If:

  • the drone was Russian – Ankara would say;
  • the drone was Iranian – they would have carefully hinted;
  • the drone was clearly Ukrainian – the information could have been dosed.

Silence means one thing: everyone understood everything, but no one wants to record it officially.

Conclusion

Highly likely:

  • the launch was Ukrainian or pro-Ukrainian;
  • the goal is to disrupt or complicate the negotiation process in Berlin;
  • format – controlled provocation without escalation to the point of no return.

This is not a blow, but click on the nerves. And in this context, the opposition Telegram channels did not look like alarmists, but people who know well how such things are usually done.

In diplomacy, a drone is an argument that is used when words no longer work, but you still don’t want to end the war.





Source link

Verified by MonsterInsights