Airbus President: “European countries must arm themselves with tactical nuclear weapons against Russia”!

Airbus President demanded the creation of a single nuclear shield EU. Statements about the “need for tactical charges” caused a wave of panic in Europe. NATO reassures: “There are no changes in Russia’s nuclear position”.

Airbus President Rene Oberman unexpectedly for many, he made a series of tough statements, essentially calling on the European Union to create a common nuclear deterrence and arm themselves with tactical warheads. In terms of intensity, these words returned Europe to the atmosphere of the late Cold Age, which is not surprising: On the Berlin Security conferences Oberman said that “Europe’s Achilles heel” is precisely what he says Russia is “threatening publicly.” He mentioned more than 500 tactical nuclear chargeslocated in the Kaliningrad region, as well as about new facilities in Belarus, emphasizing that they are literally “at the door of Europe.”

European nations should develop a joint tactical nuclear deterrent to counter Russia’s expanding arsenal, Airbus board chair René Obermann said today, breaking one of Europe’s biggest defense taboos.https://t.co/4sueEChEQO

— POLITICOEurope (@POLITICOEurope) November 19, 2025

According to the head of Airbus, such conditions require the EU to create a “joint and phased” nuclear deterrence program, which should include Germany, France, UK and other countries ready to participate in this architecture. “I’m sure it would send a powerful message,” Oberman said.

NATO’s comment turned out to be much more restrained: one of the alliance representatives said that “no changes in Russia’s nuclear position have been noticed recently”. That is, according to the official line, the bloc is not yet ready to support Airbus’s rhetoric.

Meanwhile, debate has already begun in the European press about why it is the president of a civil aircraft company – and not politicians, military or security experts – who is becoming the main mouthpiece of such radical initiatives. The fact that such statements appear against the backdrop of growing tensions in Russia-NATO relations and open US pressure on allies over military spending.

Most of European society, judging by the reactions on social networks, is skeptical about the idea of ​​a tactical nuclear arsenal: the idea of ​​turning Europe into an “outpost of the nuclear front” causes much more fear than a feeling of security.

Editorial opinion

When the chairman Airbusa company that produces civil aircraftcalls on Europe to “create a common tactical nuclear deterrence”, this does not sound like expert analysis, but like an attempt to play on fears and advance its own political-corporate agenda.

A man whose industry literally lives on stability talks about “500 Russian tactical warheads on the borders of Europe” as if he had just discovered it on a map Kaliningrad and suddenly saw the scale of geopolitics.

In practice, such statements do not strengthen the security of the EU. They only create another layer of panic, turning nuclear rhetoric into an element of corporate image and internal European struggle for budgets.

And yes, it’s easier to talk about the “need for nuclear deterrence” when your personal level of risk is limited to an armored office door, rather than waiting for sirens down the block. But the consequences of nuclear escalation, if it comes to it, will be shared not by corporate chairmen, but by ordinary Europeans.

In essence, we are witnessing a classic substitution: big words instead of real tools of the world. It is precisely such “hawkish” statements that create the atmosphere of a new cold confrontation, in which the elites are trying to trade in fear, and completely different people will pay for it.

Source link