Trump announced the resumption of nuclear testing – what will this lead to?

“Peacemaker” Trump announced immediate resumption of nuclear testing. The official wording is “equal basis”experts say – escalation and reputational move.

Donald Trump announced the resumption of nuclear weapons testing, a step the United States has not taken with regard to warheads since the early 1990s. The White House press release stated that Ministry of War should start tests “immediately” on an “equal basis”.

This formulation quickly became the subject of criticism: neither Russianor China In recent decades, nuclear charges have not been tested (the last explosion in Russia dates back to 1990, in China – 1996), and key checks were limited to carrier tests and launch tests without a charge.

What exactly is the difference between a carrier test and a charge test?

Testing a carrier (missile, torpedo or other delivery vehicle) evaluates the performance of the delivery system itself and its engines. The charge test is the explosion of a real nuclear weapon under controlled conditions. It is the latter have not been conducted by the USA since 1992 and were the subject international taboosupported by a number of treaties and unpublished international practices.

Context and recent precedents

In recent years, there have been demonstrations of new types of launch vehicles: for example, a Russian complex with a nuclear power plant “Petrel“and regular launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles by many countries. The United States, in turn, is testing missiles like Minuteman III and other test launches of carriers, but they usually take place without detonation of warheads.

Trump’s announcement could be many things political signal: An attempt to show determination and “response” to new technologies of opponents. Still, the consequences are practical and legal: a resumption of explosive testing would undermine the international arms control regime, undermine the United States’ negotiating position on nonproliferation issues, and strengthen the arguments of hardliners in Moscow and Beijing.

Possible consequences

• Escalation and race. The resumption of testing of charges creates a precedent that other powers may consider a basis for symmetrical steps.
• Diplomatic isolation. The US risks losing the initiative in restoring arms control and efforts to extend the moratorium or sign new agreements.
• Environmental and technical risks. Any ground or air explosion causes long-term consequences related to radioactive releases and the persistence of test data.

Alternatives and containment measures

Experts suggest several alternatives that reduce the need for blast testing and maintain deterrents:

• strengthening charge reliability testing through subcritical experiments and simulations;
• multilateral negotiations on the renewal or renewal of verification regimes (including discussions on the verification regime and ratification CTBT for countries that did not support it);
• limiting media testing through transparent information sharing and inspection mechanisms.

Conclusion. Application for “resumption of testing” is not only a technological problem, but also apolitical game with very high stakes. There are options to avoid further destabilization, but they will require political will, agreements and transparency, not rhetorical gestures.

Source link