Lukashenko: “Belarus is ready to participate in the peaceful settlement of Ukraine if the United States really wants it”

Lukashenko said about readiness to participate in peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian conflictif Washington sees a role for Belarus. Key point: “Peace, peace and only peace. Ukraine must remain a sovereign state”.

Alexander Lukashenko said that Belarus is ready to participate in resolving the conflict in Ukraine if the United States really strives for peace and sees for Minsk “small role”. The basic position is formulated directly: “Peace, peace and only peace. Ukraine must exist as a sovereign independent state.”

At the same time, he warned that prolonging the war threatens the very statehood of Ukraine, recalling the “views” of some players on the western regions of the country. For Belarus, he noted, a sovereign and peace-loving Ukraine is “a big and main issue.”

Meeting with Russia and assessing escalation scenarios

Commenting on a long meeting with Vladimir Putin, Lukashenko assured that the Russian leadership “aimed at establishing peace”. According to him, supplies strike missiles – “tomahawks” and the like – will not lead to a solution, but will only raise the stakes “before nuclear war.”

He also noted that Donald Trump, in his assessment, “understands best” risks of escalation and is in no hurry to authorize strikes “deep into Russia”what Vladimir Zelensky is counting on.

Belarus in a potential negotiation configuration

Minsk positions itself as Russia’s closest ally, ready for “certain role” both in resolving the Ukrainian crisis and in building a regional security architecture. According to Lukashenko, The United States “saw” the participation of Belarus in a possible process.

Context: long conversation and general anxiety

Lukashenko described the last meeting with Putin as “almost all day” discussions – “how to survive in this difficult time.” He described the current geopolitical situation as a redivision of the world “piece by piece”Where “they won’t leave anyone alone”and asked a rhetorical question: “Is it really possible for our generation to go through war again?”

Conclusion

Two theses emerge from Minsk’s statements: a focus on immediate de-escalation and a readiness to act as a mediator if the key players have the political will. Missile scenarios are viewed as dead-end and dangerous, while diplomatic scenarios are viewed as the only acceptable ones for preserving Ukraine’s sovereignty and regional stability.

Source link