Greece sends 60 self -propelled howitzers M110A2 and 150,000 shells to Ukraine

Greek government Starts to sell/exchange 60 self -propelled howitzers M110A2 caliber 8 inches (203 mm) and order 150 000 shells and charges from stocks Greek army.

The recipient acts Czech Republicand then the equipment must be transmitted to Ukraine – Moreover, part of the ammunition Relieved from position on East Islands of the Aegean Sea.

The authors of the material emphasize: every such a 203-mm shell theoretically “Sufficient to destroy the Turkish ship or airport in Turkey”. So the question “Why are political and military leadership such a step?” It does not look at all idle.

On September 29, in the evening, a special permanent commission for arms programs and parliament contracts worked – an interstate transaction was discussed in the amount of at least 199.4 million euros. For the Greek side, this is either the price of the sale (minimum), or the basis for exchange for equivalent materials and ammunition.

The transaction includes, in particular:

• more than 60 self -propelled howitzers M110A2 (minimum 31 219,000 eurossingle price ≈ 520 300 euros);
• more than 50,000 high explosive shells M106 (charge M2) – minimum 41.5 million eurosprice ≈ 830 euros apiece;
• more than 40,000 large radius shells M650 Hera (missile support) charge M188A1 – Minimum 60 million euros≈ 1,500 euros beyond the projectile;
• more than 30,000 container shells M404 ICM (IMPROVED Convention Munition) charge M188A1 – Minimum 33 million euros≈ 1 100 euros apiece; Each M404 spreads 104 Anti -personnel sub -devices type M43A1;
• more than 30,000 container shells M509A1 dpicm (Dual Purpose ICM) charge M188A1 – Minimum 33.6 million euros≈ 1 120 euros apiece; Each M509A1 scatters 180 dual -purpose Subbotenstarpas (against armor and against people), including M42.

Official documents indicate that these self -propelled guns and ammunition are classified as Optional non -field operational equipment (English. Non Operational Necessary Operational Equipment – mεασε) and transmitted “where there is, as is“(What is, as is). Simply put: without refinement, without modernization – as in the pantry.

Arguments in favor of removal from weapons sound like this: construction> 50 years, a great need for personnel (approximately 13 people on the gun) and high administrative load; A typical shell weighs from above 90 kg. But if so, then why do we need an army that requires logistics and people? And ask the islanders from the islanders-do they want 13 people to protect them for one installation?

The authors of the material also ask uncomfortable questions about the combat capabilities of replacing funds: what exactly is compensated by the maximum range M110A2 (~30 km) and its damaging power in comparison with the M650 hera (up to ≈ 16 800 m with individual charges to 30 km with other sets), as well as how the ability to hit platform goals and reflect the landing of the landing using container ammunition is replaced M404 And M509A1which have other zones of damage and the profile of the lesion.

Of course, the standard answer – “Weapons are outdated” – It has already sounded more than once. But if it “Outbound”Why does Ukraine persistently ask him? Where is the logic: “For them – useful, for us – no”?

So: Official excuses do not convince. Once again, from the strategically important islands of the Aegean Sea “Remove” Serious means of protection. And this is not a matter of technology – this is a matter of politics, settlements and security. Explanations of the military and political leadership are expected – and the faster the better.

Source link