From democracy to regime: as a mycatriytiystis drives the country into a crisis

“The government grabbed the governmentbut thereby only deepens the political and institutional crisis ” writes in the editorial article the editor -in -chief of the leading Greek edition in.gr Lefteris harallambopoulos.

Democracy – A very peculiar system. But this is the best that we can have. For its normal work, you need not only to observe Formal proceduresbut also understand that the game itself turns somewhere between the form and essential legitimacy.

Today in Greece we are faced with a gap between form and content. Formally We have a government with a comfortable parliamentary majority based on a percentage of votes, which many parties of Europe can only dream. Actually it is – The government of the minoritycovered by deep public hostility and shocked by a tragedy in Tempe. There, people saw that the authorities not only refused to take responsibility, but also resorted to attempts Closing evidence.

Polls clearly show: this power has no chance of self -sufficiency. But New democracy And Kiryakos Mitsotakis They prefer to cling to the chairs.

Power mechanics without trust

Formally, the majority allows them accept any lawsblock the investigative committees, reject the removal of immunity and appoint your people in “Independent organs”. But in reality, such a practice burns the country deeper in crisis of trust.

We saw this during the discussion preliminary investigations on M. Woridis and L. Augenakis. The result was a predetermined: the government did not give “green light”investigation, continuing the line of impunity by the scandal with Οπεκεπε. However, the very way that was done was humiliation of parliamentarism.

In fact, they told us: the majority can do everything, and the procedures are only a screen behind which is hidden gesture of mockery of the people. So the government itself rewrites the rules of the game.

Laws against society

In addition, the government is in a hurry to drag a number of laws that cause furious protests through the parliament:

• changes in disciplinary law of students and teachersaimed at Criminalization of protests against government reforms;
• Private work “Supermarkets of diplomas”who undermine the education system.

Formal logic suggests: elections will come – and society will say its word. But Today’s behavior of power only consolidates the perception that “Game bought”. And this leads either to social explosioneither to apathy and the search for individual survival. In the worst version – to growth right -wing rhetoricplaying on the slogan “All are the same”.

From democracy to regime

New Democracy and Kiryak Mitzakotisi do not behave more and more like Favorite Democratic Governmentbut how mode. Their arrogance in parliament does not correspond to the party whose rating does not reach 30% In research. This is not just a policy – it is Institutional crisisdestroying confidence in the democracy itself.

Let us recall how in the era of memorandums the deputies voted for the laws that they did not even read – they simply said: “Troika approved”. Today, the ND and the Mitsikitis make even worse: they turn the parliament into playgroundwhere only the rule of the majority acts.

What you need next

Now we are talking not only about a strong opposition. Required New movement for the restoration of democracyits true meaning and trust in society to institutions. New “Anndotos*” – an irreconcilable struggle both inside the parliament, and mainly On the streets.

The goal is not only the next election, but Return to the Society of Vera In democracy, its institutions and own forces.

*”Ανένδοτος “ (pronounced anndotos) is a historical term in Greek policy. It means literally “implacable”, “inconspicuous”. But in a political context, the word is associated with a specific movement: in 1961, the leader of the party ένωση κέντρου (Union of the Center) Georgios Papandreu declared the beginning of the struggle against the then new democracy (under the leadership of Konstantinos Karamanlis) after the elections, which the opposition considered it falsified.

This long -term political and street campaign went down in history as “Ανένδοτος αγώνας” – “Unfinished struggle”. The goal was to restore democratic procedures and the fight against what was called the “paradognity” and the influence of the court (king) on power.

? That is, when the author of the article writes about “New ανένδοτος”he draws a parallel: calls for a new implacable movement of citizens and the opposition – for the return of the real meaning of democracy, as Papandreu did in the 1960s.

The author’s opinion may not reflect the opinion of the editorial office

Source link