Greece: "Ethics Code of AI for Journalists"

The new code of use of AI, which is represented by the PANELLING Federation of Journalistic Associations (POSY), denotes the rules for applying artificial intelligence in the work of media employees.

The basic principle is transparency: If a journalist uses AI, he must appropriately designate this.

Poesy, tells Euronews, has become The first professional association in Greece and the first journalistic federation in Europewhich submitted the Ethics Code of AI. He obliges all its members to apply the established rules. Government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis explains:

“First of all, there should be transparency. That is, when the article is fully or partially the product of AI, this should be indicated. The reader must know: what he reads is done with the help of AI. In addition, there should be Human controlbecause no matter how difficult cars are, it is difficult to replace a person in this situation. In addition, the Federation introduced other serious and innovative provisions, which show that Greece journalists, our associations are much ahead of both the European and world level. “

As for the possibility of the Government of the Legislative Act on this issue, Marinakis says that negotiations are underway with Ponesy and other associations of journalists “On updating existing legislation on the basis of the new Code.” He emphasizes:

“I believe that this document is a necessary basis on which we can Update laws“.

President of PoESY Sotiris Triantafillos in an interview with Euronews notes:

“We are at the beginning of a very long journey. This technology, which I would call destructive, subversive not only for journalism and labor relations, but also for society as a whole. As in the case of other technological achievements and major technological changes, there will be a lot of problems at the beginning of the way with AI. That is why we are going to create conditions to bring everything in order and, possibly, to solve the problems that will arise because it will arise because Problems will be.

The adoption of the Ethics Code is considered as a positive step and the association of Internet owners. If the journalist finds in the media a practice contrary to the Code, he should contact the trade union bodies.

To develop the Code, it was created AI Committee With the participation of experts in this area, who worked on a voluntary basis for about a year. The main idea of ​​the Code, according to the chairman of the committee and professor of the right of Spiros Vlakhopoulos, is that the future is for AI, but he is not able to replace the journalist:

“He connects journalists and establishes the basic rules in relation to AI, namely: how it will be used, what are potential risks that need to be eliminated. At the same time, we must emphasize this, is a shield for a journalist, that is, when he is asked to use the AI ​​in this way that contradicts the basic ethical principles, he will be able to legally refuse and be protected, for example, from unlawful dismissal.”

AI will help reporters, but will not be able to replace them in workHe believes. The key principle underlying the Code is transparency, that is, when the journalist uses AI, this should be the appropriate mark.

Although the Code of Conduct belongs to the category of soft law, that is, general law, it has legal consequences, that is, it can entail disciplinary or other responsibility in case of non -compliance.

Speaking of reports published About the freedom of the press in Greecethe government press secretary added that in the latest documents of the European Commission, the progress achieved by the country is noted ”:

“We read the report of a non -governmental organization that accused Greece of complicating the position of journalists of a plan of diffamation, while we canceled criminal prosecution over a year ago. This contradicts reality, while the European Commission reports that it is a reality.”

Pavlos Marinakis noted that Greece “now has only four recommendations on these issues”, and not six, as before. 18 European countries have more than Greece. He believes:

“The image that some are trying to create, I mean opposition euro deputies and a very small part of the media directed against our country, is not true. There are two ways that the politician can go, representing his country abroad. One way is to slander the sake of small political benefits. Another way is to understand what you represent your country, and not just the party or the positive things that it has done, you can promote, you can promote, Recognizing what needs to be done even more. “

Reporting the measures taken to improve the situation with the freedom of the press, the government spokesman emphasized that the criminal liability was canceled for the “simple diplomaticium”*, one of the biggest requirements of the journalistic world, since it was based on judicial claims that were deeply problematic for journalists:

“We greatly modernized our legislative framework. In order for the lawsuit to be filed against a journalist, it is necessary to have a judicial prohibition of ex Officio. Now we have public television, ERT, which is guided by the chairman and chief executive director, appointed as a result of the elective process, and not the sole decision of the Minister or Deputy Minister, in this case, with the help of the new law on the election of the administration in the civilian.”

According to Marinakis, measures have been taken to ensure the safety of journalists:

“We tightened the punishment for all offenses, including against representatives of the press, introduced a special corpus delicti for threats to sports journalists, introduce all European practices to inform and train journalists. For example, everyone who goes to the war zone or illuminate natural disasters should undergo appropriate training. So Greece is a state that moves forward and, besides that it is moving forward and, in addition Improving the indicators financially is also a legal state, and not what it is presented in some undocumented reports. ”

*Term “defamation” exists both in Russian and foreign legislation and civil law, and means dissemination of legal or individuals of any defamatory information. The difference between diffamation from slander is that when slander, the criminal moment consists in Veved The deceitful facts or information disgraced by the slander, while during diplomasia the disclosure itself is considered illegal, even if the discloser was convinced of the truth of the disclosure, sometimes even if he could present evidence of such truth.

Source link