How publicity affects justice in Greece

Too big Publicity “Success” law enforcement agencies sometimes Conditions As the case shows With the case of corruption in the urban planning department of the Rhodes City Hall.

In this regard, the case, which received wide publicity in the media and ended absence preliminary imprisonment for the involved persons with the consent of the investigator and prosecutor Rhodes who conduct this case, the chairman of the Supreme Court of Greece John the valve I demanded to conduct a disciplinary verification of judicial workers.

This, in turn, caused a loud intervention Associations of Greece prosecutors (Εεεughter), who issued two statements directed directly against the chairman of the Supreme Court, accusing her of an order on a disciplinary inspection and claiming that she violates the constitutionally fixed Independence of judicial workers.

What does it mean? This means that the prosecutor and investigator, at his discretion and taking into account the data they had, decided that there was no reason to preliminary conclude the accused, since the risk of escape, the commission of new similar crimes or attempts to conceal evidence in the case was not established. This decision was made by people based on the data they have and their personal assessment.

Perhaps, for “advertising” reasons and to create an image of “restoration of law and order and the fight against corruption”, the government and pro-government media would very much like to imagine that this decision would not be popular.

However, according to the Constitution, the judges know the case and it is they who make decisions, and no one else. Thus, this means that the authorities extended statements about premature “successes” with specific goals. The successes that are used in order for society to believe that there are already accomplished results.

The resulting results and predetermined trials exist only in countries with totalitarian regimes. If the data is insufficient and unreliable, “disappointment” arises. Typically, such “leaks” come from the police: either for political reasons, or to demonstrate the results of the work.

Political “channel” – This is the creation of the possibility of changing the political agenda, when the government is in a difficult situation, as, for example, in recent months with a crime in the pace and with the fall of ratings. This was manifested in various cases, and not only in the case of corruption in the urban planning department of the Rhodes City Hall.

For example in case the so -called Russian mafia, which allegedly acted through a network of smuggled cigarettes and ultimately It turned out to be Ukrainianand five murders were attributed to her, we can say that the famous proverb “found the scapegoat” here is quite appropriate.

In particular, it was said that the head of this mafia lives in Dubai, but the Emirates did not agree to extradite him, since they did not receive sufficient evidence confirming specific accusations. In short, the OAE prosecutorial authorities “put a Greek request under cloth under cloth, because the accusation was not“ justified ”.

Why failed to make a “reasonable” accusation? Either because there is no evidence, or because they did not work quite hard, methodically and, as it should, to collect the necessary data and evidence. Because justice is not a “store” and does not function on the basis of “gossip” or evidence of “we were told, we heard, someone saw”.

Even when there is an indisputable fault of some in the minds of all (especially in cases where it is formed by the media), it must be legally justified. And this requires qualified specialists and a lot, a lot of work. And the last, paramedly, a sore spot at the Greek civil servants …

Source link