“It is really worth respect that “there is no censorship in art.” But is every creative form of expression art? “writes on his blog Metropolitan Messian Chrisosta.
“The works that were exhibited in the National Gallery, what are these works?
– asked Archbishop Jerome. –
All days are holy, but we want to change them. There are no reactions, there are positions. The big question is whether this building is private? Is this a personal matter of the artist who presented these works, or is it our common? Let's think seriously and approach this with due seriousness.
Every artist cannot imagine them in this way and get such results. Responsibility lies with all of us, from the top to bottom. ”
“Insulting religious symbols, especially in public space, can be considered an art when images of holy faces are ridiculed in such an unacceptable way that this declares the distortion of human beauty and the distorted content of human morality?
Of course, although such a provocative demonstration “Artistic creativity”insulting religious feelings, is not accepted and not respected by everyone, this does not justify a similar way of vandalism and destruction in the public exhibition space.
In this exhibition space, everything is evaluated and considered publicly, positively or negatively, and always within the framework that are dictated by the culture of art, the history of this people and its traditions. A tradition that determines the basis of the Greek culture of our homeland and the Christian religiosity of our people.
Many times the expressions of artists have appeared who make fun of the religiosity of Orthodox Christians, while any free expression of criticism or disagreement is interpreted as obscurantism or conservatism.
It is reasonable that the popular religious feeling asks: mOllae would some artists create similar distorted expressions of faces or those related to the Koran or religiosity of Muslims, and even call them obscurantists and reactionaries for reacting, how dare they do this in relation to Christians?
Let the artists and everyone who supports them seriously react to this, because times do not contribute to such artistic excesses and religious confrontations. “
From the editorial office: After the “pogrom” arranged in the National Gallery deputy of parliament from the party “Nicky” Nikolaos Papadopulos, where in one of the halls the exhibition of the “artist” Alexander Sutsos is taking place, a fierce discussion unfolded in the Greek society.
“In our difficult time, when even atheists from hopelessness turn to the Almighty, such a picture is real blasphemy. You try to insult Muslims or Jews so much! And above us, Christians, so you can mock, hiding behind the lack of censorship in art?”, – the deputy is indignant.
How reporteddeputy tore off several works of the “artist” from the walls and threw them on the floorsaying that it is Not art, but blasphemy. The police arrested the deputy called by the guards, accusing him of a particularly serious crime – Vandalism.
Some believe that All art has the right to lifeothers believe that it is necessary to separate art and blasphemythat is, Conscious insult of religious symbols and faith.
On this occasion Specked also Archbishop of Athens and all of Greece Jerome. Turning to the cameras of the morning television show, the head of the Elladsky Church spoke about the “works”, which were exhibited in National Gallery.



More Stories
While Dubai is nervous, the Mediterranean can win: a chance for tourism and real estate in Greece
I want your money and.. oil
The Persian Gulf is under fire: will the petrodollar system survive the war?