CIA: coronavirus is not a biological weapon

The American special services have completed another, it is no longer known which one, investigation of the origin of the new coronavirus infection SARS-CoV-2. Excerpts from the report to US President Joe Biden were released on Friday August 27th. Reuters

American intelligence has concluded that the coronavirus is not a development of biological weapons. At the same time, it remains unclear exactly how this infection appeared, despite the fact that in Washington, at the highest level, it was claimed that this is a product of Chinese biological laboratories.

Two hypotheses and no specifics

The intelligence community has split into two camps over the origin of SARS-CoV-2. The former believe that the virus is zoonotic, that is, passed from non-human animals to humans. According to the second version, the coronavirus is of laboratory origin, while the pandemic began after the infection “broke out” outside the laboratory in Wuhan, China.

“We will not be able to provide a clearer explanation of the origin of COVID-19 until new information becomes available. Most likely, China’s assistance will be required to give a final assessment of its origin, ”analysts said.

The report also notes that the Chinese authorities were not aware of the coronavirus prior to the outbreak of the pandemic. At the same time, the intelligence believes that Beijing’s actions on this issue “demonstrate China’s uncertainty in the final results.”

Let’s try to add another third hypothesis: during the investigation, the CIA reached out to themselves or their colleagues. And this is what caused such an unexpected conclusion of the investigation. Moreover, this has been repeatedly stated in China.

You need to work more carefully, gentlemen, not to get carried away.





Source link

High-quality journalistic work cannot be free, otherwise it becomes dependent on the authorities or the oligarchs.
Our site is solely funded by advertising money.
Please disable your ad blocker to continue reading the news.
Best regards, editors